Value contribution of olipudase alfa therapy for the management of the non-CNS manifestations of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency by multi-criteria decision analysis

Value contribution of olipudase alfa therapy for the management of the non-CNS manifestations of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency by multi-criteria decision analysis

Jesús Villarubia 1, María Reyes-Abad 2, Antonio González-Meneses 3, Elena Gras-Colomer 4, José L. Poveda 5, José L. Trillo 6, Daniel de Vicente 7, Mateo Baret 8, Ariadna Giró-Perafita 9, Xavier Badia 8

1 Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, España; 2 Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; 3 Dysmorphology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España; 4 Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Manises, Valencia, España; 5 Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; 6 Department of Clinic-Malvarrosa, Valencia, Spain; 7 ASMD España, Madrid, Spain; 8 Omakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain; 9 Omakase Consulting S.L, Barcelona, España

Jesús Villarubia, María Reyes-Abad, Antonio González-Meneses, Elena Gras-Colomer, José L. Poveda, José L. Trillo, Daniel de Vicente, Mateo Baret, Ariadna Giró-Perafita, Xavier Badia

La información completa de afiliaciones y autor de correspondencia está disponible en la versión original en PDF.

*Correspondence: Antonio González-Meneses, Email not available

Summary

Introduction: Olipudase alfa, an enzyme replacement therapy, is the first treatment approved for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD), a rare lysosomal storage disease. Objective: To determine the value contribution of olipudase alfa to treat non-central nervous system (CNS) manifestations of ASMD using MCDA methodology. Methods: A literature review was conducted to populate an adapted MCDA framework for orphan-drug evaluation. A multidisciplinary panel of 8 experts were trained in MCDA methodology and scored the evidence matrix. Scoring consistency was explored through a test-retest reliability analysis. Results: ASMD was considered a severe disease (mean, 4.1 ± 0.6) with significant unmet needs (4.9 ± 0.4). Experts perceived that olipudase alfa may improve efficacy/effectiveness (4.4 ± 0.7), and has a favorable safety profile (3.0 ± 2.6). Additionally, its therapeutic benefit was considered relevant (4.3 ± 0.7) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (2.4 ± 1.8) were rated as moderate. Lower medical costs (2.6 ± 1.3) and indirect cost savings (2.9 ± 1.1) would be expected. Evidence presented was considered adequate (3.9 ± 1.0). The test-retest analysis indicated consistency in the scoring of almost all criteria. Lower correlation scores were observed in criteria with more dispersion as expert’s scoring perception was addressed during the discussion session. Conclusion: Olipudase alfa may provide a high-value intervention to treat non-CNS manifestations of ASMD.

Keywords:  Drugs evaluation. Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency. Olipudase alfa. Multicriteria decision analysis. Rare diseases.

Contents